This blog explores Milwaukee criminal defence lawyer misconduct, including the concealment of evidence, the falsification of psychological reports, the protection of a child abuser, and various other criminal activities … conducted by officers of the court. Their reach and revenge ultimately extended to the internet, and to a Swiss university.
The reader can decide the extent to which the lawyers named here are representative of our legal system.
As with all concealed misconduct, a light-up should lead to a clean-up. As one example, it should not be possible for Wisconsin law that protects children to then fail an abused child because one corrupt lawyer feared upholding the law… fearing what might be revealed if the law were honored.
The story here, of depraved conduct by officers of the Milwaukee court, will be placed on the blog in continuing segments.
The author hopes that constructive comments and questions will be forthcoming, for response.
A type of fraud is practiced by criminal defence lawyers, yet it remains ignored and concealed: the deception of clients/defendants, most notably for the purpose of achieving a plea bargain.
This type of lawyer fraud is “organised” much like the Vatican organised pedophilia: the problem was known to exist but was ignored, those who exposed the problem were silenced, the guilty were protected.
The impact of this lawyer fraud is profound; it has a name: the Lawyer Betrayal Syndrome.
The common tool at the heart of this fraud is lawyer coercion to force a plea bargain. Confidentiality and wiliness in a lawyer’s office make exposing this misconduct extremely difficult.
The regulatory bodies responsible for monitoring lawyer ethics suffer the fox’s dilemma when it is asked to protect a chicken from another fox.
Journalists fear litigation and the termination of sources, if what they report offends influential lawyers.
A power imbalance aids a criminal defence lawyer in defrauding a client. Few dare to side with a defendant vs. their lawyer, especially if the client’s mental health reports have been falsified to cause questioning and fear.
The case reported here has been simmering for years. It has gone largely unreported, or it has been reported to satisfy corrupt Milwaukee lawyer expectations, seeding the internet and local media with misinformation.
Of what value is illustrating a case of legal system corruption years old? No different from the value an adult finds in seeking justice from the Catholic Church, reaching back 25 years or more to their childhood. Or the value that the FBI invokes when they ferret out a fugitive, escaped years earlier. “You can run, you can hide, but we will find you, no matter how long.”
It isn’t just Einstein’s relativistic world that has clocks tick at different rates. A perpetrator’s clock says that minutes are hours, and hours are days, days are years, years are a previous life just forget it. This variance in the relevance of memories of dirty deeds was well exemplified by Lawyer Margret O’Connor, of Racine, WI. Lawyer Margaret O’Connor wasn’t a lawyer at the time of the legal travesty; she was Lawyer Martin Kohler’s paralegal. Saw everything, including racial profiling of the jury, for a rigged trial demanded the elimination of all Blacks. She recently requested, in writing, that we “move on” from exposing a story in which she was instrumental and a prime witness.
It’s an old story; perpetrators want secrets kept, victims yearn for truth. I declined Lawyer O’Connor’s advice.
This victim’s clock stopped on the day that his child was returned to his abuser, the day when lawyers concealed gross misconduct, other lawyers aided them, and the child was gone forever.
The clock stopped when psychological reports were falsified, then laundered through the courts. When information on the web was and remains intended to destroy evidence by rendering the voice of the victim impotent.
The following people contributed to a legal travesty. They have names; some are still around. Their roles in the story make them worthy of attention:
- Judge David Hansher;
- Lawyer Martin Kohler;
- Lawyer Fred Matestic;
- Lawyer Robert Elliott;
- Lawyer Jeff Hughes.
- Lawyer Robert Henak;
- Lawyer Stephen Glynn.
And Probation Officer Cordell Wilson participated too. He exhibited extraordinary interest in making sure that Lawyer Kohler received payment for a libel suit – the highest amount ever awarded against an author in the State of Wisconsin. The author’s literary crime was exposing Milwaukee legal system corruption in booklets.
All participants in this case are invited to comment.
to be continued……